When market goes against us we shuld use martin with different multiple distance. Like 1000, 1500, 2300 etc.
Need to add in martigale distance and multiple distance coficient.
Without distance
With distance multiplicator it look like this:
We need values:
- distance
- distance multiplicator
Example:
- distance 1000
- distance multiplicator 1.5
Steps:
1000 = fiers step
1500 = 1000*1.5
2250 = 1500*1.5
3375 = 2250*1.5
Every next step multiplies.
My idea is already done.
| Martingale type | Type of martingale strategy used: Martingale disabled — no additional deals will be opened; Fixed step (in points) — deals will be opened every Step size points; Previous step * coefficient — first adding deal will be opened after Step size points, then step will be changed by Step coefficient. For example, with Step = 20 and Coefficient = 1.2, steps between deals will be: 20 - 24 - 28.8 - 51.84 and so on. ATR * coefficient — step between deals will be calculated as ATR * Step coefficient (will change every bar of ATR TimeFrame). |
| Step size | Step size (in points) for Martingale types “Fixed step” and “Previous step * coefficient” |
| Step coefficient | Step coefficient for Martingale types “Previous step * coefficient” and “ATR * coefficient” |
My idea is already done.
| Martingale type | Type of martingale strategy used: Martingale disabled — no additional deals will be opened; Fixed step (in points) — deals will be opened every Step size points; Previous step * coefficient — first adding deal will be opened after Step size points, then step will be changed by Step coefficient. For example, with Step = 20 and Coefficient = 1.2, steps between deals will be: 20 - 24 - 28.8 - 51.84 and so on. ATR * coefficient — step between deals will be calculated as ATR * Step coefficient (will change every bar of ATR TimeFrame). |
| Step size | Step size (in points) for Martingale types “Fixed step” and “Previous step * coefficient” |
| Step coefficient | Step coefficient for Martingale types “Previous step * coefficient” and “ATR * coefficient” |
Yes. I misunderstood ur idea. :(
I have given a similar suggestion. May plz vote.
Not sure whether these are to be merged.
https://communitypowerea.userecho.com/en/communities/1/topics/240-increase-step-sizeco-efficient-after-certain-number-of-trades-or-dd
https://communitypowerea.userecho.com/en/communities/1/topics/231-separate-lot-co-efficientstep-size-for-buy-and-sell-trades-in-a-grid-set