Migrating this EA to 2.31

Avatar
  • updated
  • Not a bug

I am having issues migrating this EA to the new version 2.31

This is the previous setfile with the results on 2.3

MT5_EURUSD_M5_NOTDIAutoFibo_O3B.set

Image 1382

And this is the best I can get now :(

Image 1383

with this new set file

o3bmax_cpv231.set

Any kind of help would be appreciated

Avatar
1
Sai Pratap

Something with ur conversion. Iam able to replicate same results on 2.30 & 2.31

Below is the set file after conversion to 2.31. May check at ur end.

MT5_EURUSD_M5_NOTDIAutoFibo_O3B_2.31.3.set

Avatar
3
Ulises Cune

Hello Hannes,

If you use my script to migrate from version 2.30 to 2.31 it is equal result.

https://communitypowerea.userecho.com/en/communities/7/topics/336-migrate-settings-file-230-to-231-version?redirect_to_reply=1972#comment-1972

You simply have to drag the file from version 2.30 and press the button and it will migrate to version 2.31


Convert_2.30_to_2.31-gui.ps1

MT5_EURUSD_M5_NOTDIAutoFibo_O3B-v2.31.set

This is the file converted to 2.31 version

Avatar
1
Hannes Waser

Thank you! I will double check.

Unfortunately I can't use the script on my Linux machine but I understand the commands in it. Hopefully at least. :)

Avatar
0
Ulises Cune
Quote from Hannes Waser

Thank you! I will double check.

Unfortunately I can't use the script on my Linux machine but I understand the commands in it. Hopefully at least. :)

Yes, You can use Powershell in Linux. I like Linux and I use it.

Officially supported platform releases for PowerShell 7.1

  • Ubuntu 16.04/18.04/20.04 (including ARM64)
  • Ubuntu 19.10 (via Snap package)
  • Debian 9/10
  • CentOS and RHEL 7/8
  • Fedora 30
  • Alpine 3.11+ (including ARM64)

Try this:

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/scripting/install/installing-powershell-core-on-linux?view=powershell-7.1

Avatar
1
Hannes Waser

wohaa! :) Didn't know that! Thank you very much.

Now, the results are indeed better.

However, they are not 100% equal but something around 99%.


But good enough for me.


Results with 2.30


Results with the converted 2.31


Thank you very much for your input!

Avatar
0
Ulises Cune
Quote from Hannes Waser

wohaa! :) Didn't know that! Thank you very much.

Now, the results are indeed better.

However, they are not 100% equal but something around 99%.


But good enough for me.


Results with 2.30


Results with the converted 2.31


Thank you very much for your input!

You are welcome.

I am very glad that it has been useful to you.

Avatar
0
Andrey Khatimlianskyi
  • Not a bug

Glad to see you fixed your problem )