CP TUNICA FIBO

Avatar
  • updated
  • Checked

I did some octafx MT5 testing from 2016 to today on multiple EU, GU, EJ, UF, UC pairs. 

I have optimized for each pair its setting that I will be working in demo from the new year.

We share the results, opinions and advice.
Thanks

CP EJ FIBO 13D.set

CP EU FIBO 48DD.set
CP GU FIBO 18DD.set

CP UF FIBO 22D.set

CP UC FIBO 37D.set

MT version:
Both MT5 and MT4 set-files available
EA version:
CP 2.23
Symbol:
EU, GU, UF, UC, EJ
TimeFrame:
5 Minuti
Avatar
Andrey Khatimlianskyi
  • Under review

Good job!

Thanks for sharing.

Avatar
Andrey Khatimlianskyi
  • Checked

EU is the same as in the other topic.


GU is very strange - big opposite M1 candle signal for opening + CCI M6 cross MA signal for both opening and closing!?

Seems you try to find settings using optimization over all parameters ;)

It is not good idea... Strategy should be logical firstly.

And it still can't pass 2020:

What broker do you use?

Do you use "All real ticks"?

Avatar
dante tunica

I usually insert a new element and try it in 2107 looking for parameter optimization. The one that had a lower DD and a better yield I launch in the period 2016-2020. I do a new optimization in the period in which it has had more difficulties. If it improves, I repeat throughout the period. Unfortunately MT5 doesn't seem to always give the same results. If the result of a positive optimization is thrown it sometimes goes to 0 ?? !!! I use real delays and delays of 100 ms. I used random delays before. Octafx, 

Avatar
Sai Pratap

Iam also using OctaFX but my results are different from u Dante Tunica.

Not sure where am I going wrong! I also got bad results like Andrey sir with most of the pairs.

Avatar
dante tunica

Thanks for the feedback, until I get results similar to yours, my tests will be unreliable