Increasing the TP size can be a disadvantage. Example: You have a good set file that works with TP = 50. If you make TP = 100, orders are more likely to return from 50-99 without Take Profit.
I'll answer as you did: you can move SL to the break-even after 50 points of profit to prevent these returns ;)
I can't catch the advantage of "close on the end of bar". It seems you just like it without any explanation )
Increasing the TP size can be a disadvantage. Example: You have a good set file that works with TP = 50. If you make TP = 100, orders are more likely to return from 50-99 without Take Profit.
Did you try to increase TP size?
Your idea is clear, we can set SL to BE and wait till the end of the bar, but I am still skeptical...
This option is for regular TakeProfit only. I hope it will be in the TakeProfit section.
You are right. I've experienced your script several times. It happened with a probability of 10-20%. However, the close option at the end of the candle increases the earnings significantly. After passing the TP level on the new candle, there should be a lock at the Breakeven level. This will prevent damage.
Is this option for regular TP only? If so, why?
Why not to increase TP size?
Why do you want to check the TP only once a bar?
What about this scenario:
No support at all. Suspending...