Martingale : To open layer based on Favorable TP distance & Dynamic Time Frame
Got 2 things to share, if this may be of interest for our CP :
1. Martingale open layers based on TP Distance
Martingale in CP opens layers if certain conditions is met, but, mostly based on distance.
In some market condition, oftentimes prices are sideways to much, thus make the next martingale layer couldn't open.
In some ways, when the last layer is stuck on sideways, the way to make the TP distance closer, is to open another marti layer on that sideways situation. EA will not calculate based on distance from last layer, but calculate if the new layer will bring TP Closer or not.
This way , on sideways, TP distance can be shortened, as well as the risk of dragged out even more if market decided to still go other way.
So if this feature is ON, CP can open layer Marti by minimum distance and/or calculation if the TP will be shorter ( by x %, probably ? )
2. Dynamic Time Frame for Martingale layers
User can set dynamic time frame for martingale layers; with the choice of a. based on DD% b. based on #of layers opened.
Example, in the main set, TF M1 is choosed. After DD reached 5%, TF changed to M5, and after DD Reached 10% TF changed to M15, and so on.
Or, it could be after #layers opened.
Both idea above, if combined, may give more 'time' for the trades to shorter the TP, and also save some margin on unfavorable conditions.
Will love to hear from you guys.
Thanksss
hi andrey thank you
the main point of the Idea #1 is to have the EA calculate better position to favorably decrease the TP distance on the sideways condition.
often time market just wont move to the idel level for new layer ( not enough distance from the last layer ) but actually price could still be favorable for the averaging. And if the new marti entry is coming, the TP could get closer by xx points or xx%.
the main point of the idea #2 is to put some brakes on the EA after lot of layers opened or DD is high already -- but the EA will still try to calculate entry for better TP position, its just the frequency will be lesser.
I have read about your inputs and the new idea on the new update, cant find some understanding to have those to accomodate above points
thank you for the really great job for the EA and the improvements!!!