CAP Close trading / back to an old level trading
Cap Close Strategie
I checked manual EURUSD, DAX and DOW JONES with data from investing.com for 2022-2023
EURUSD
Days times % close
1st day 481 93.22
2nd day 6 1.16
3rd day 2 0.39
4th day 3 0.58
95.35 % after 4 days
DOW Jones
times % closed
1st day 325 63.85
2nd day 43 8.45
3rd day 21 4.13
4th day 15 2.95
5th day 9 1.77
81.14 % after 5 days
DAX
times % closed
1st day 289 56.78
2nd day 54 10.61
3rd day 29 5.70
4th day 18 3.54
5th day 17 3.34
79.96 % after 5 days
new parameters:
- Target (Take Profit): candle close on a specific time. eg. 17:30, 1 min, 5 Min, 30 Min.
- Distance from Target: in Points or % ATR to open a trade towards Target Price.
- min distance in Points or % ATR to open a trade.
- Distance to Target in Points or % ATR for later or earlier trade close. (under- overshoot target price)
Signal should be valid for 24h. Can become multiple time filled/closed
If open trade is not closed on day one, have new deals should be possible daily (0-x time) and run them parallel
Example:
at 17:30 EURUSD is 1.100
active Periode 1: 09:00-10:00. we open trade at 1.112
close at 1.102
Not closed days are mostly when a strong trend begins, avoid with news filter
Here is the result with DOW Jones Backtest.
I test without SL to see max decrease.
I open Trades 1h before New York is open. (Open) Trade windows 3h.
Problem:
Sometimes on new days, I get new "inital" trades even the old are not closed. (Hedge allowed true&false).
Then the old trades are closed with a loss. I assume that correct because on new day new TP (MA1) but its not clear. May be we have settings i not know yet?
Overall, without strong trends, the CAP Close strategy is regularly positive. Martingale increases profit huge.
Important is US Newsfilter for 48h, which I don't use in the backtest.
DOW can go very far quickly, but can also go back again
Strong trend after non farm payroll
losses without SL. may be beause moving target.
ICmarkets Set File CP_DOW_MA1-D1.set
You can't have 2 "initial" (first) trades with the CP.
So, they are martin/anti-amrtin. Check carefully.