logo

S&P500 Night Scalper

Avatar
Jerome Powell
  • updated
  • Checked

Sometimes its a simpel Idea. It opens after marktets and closes before opening. 

Check your GMT Filters if you test yourself. 

Image 6510

NightScalper - S&P500.set


Let me know what you think.

NOTE: The break in the end is not a crash, I like to forward test my setfiles. Do you like forward testing? 

MT version:
Set for MT5 only
EA version:
2.61
Symbol:
S&P500
TimeFrame:
M5
Replies 5
Avatar
1
leo

try long above MA only , on Daily, e.g. MA 100, 1D , or try above Pivot Point only. It should avoid long trades in a stronger short Trend. And CP 2.61 is different to CP 3.01. See changelog. 

Avatar
0
Jerome Powell
Quote from leo

Hi Jerome, thanks for the setup.

I tried on DAX, NQ - USTEC , similar result,( only SL needed a change to 7000-9000) 

Image 6511

I do forwardtest on demo accounts. IC market is weak. so since 2 Month I run now strategies on oanda+tickmill as well. 

"Overnight" means  Asian Session?  Much calmer. better predictable for EA's. After Results like normal backtest the loss periode with additional Filters. retest then the full periode.

Yes, with overnight I meant Asia session. I do all my backtests and forward test with AdmiralMarkets and for me they have the most reliable history so far. 

I´m currently trying to smooth out the DD but could not find any solution yet. 

Avatar
0
leo

Hi Jerome, thanks for the setup.

I tried on DAX, NQ - USTEC , similar result,( only SL needed a change to 7000-9000) 

Image 6511

I do forwardtest on demo accounts. IC market is weak. so since 2 Month I run now strategies on oanda+tickmill as well. 

"Overnight" means  Asian Session?  Much calmer. better predictable for EA's. After Results like normal backtest the loss periode with additional Filters. retest then the full periode.

Avatar
1
Jerome Powell
Quote from Andrey Khatimlianskyi

Nice set! Thanks for sharing!

Why are you still on 2.61? Is upgrading to 3.x stressing you out?

I always do forward-testing, but manually, after all optimizations and fine-tunings on previous history.

Thanks for the feedback. The only reason is that 3.x version had no extras that influenced this strategies. I also just checked with the 3.x Upgrade and its working with that the same as with the 2.61, so it was just random that I used the 2.61. But I will try to do the MS for all major us indices and look how it will play out. So thats when I use 3.x versions :) Thank you for that great work Andrey! 

Avatar
0
Andrey Khatimlianskyi
  • Checked

Nice set! Thanks for sharing!

Why are you still on 2.61? Is upgrading to 3.x stressing you out?

I always do forward-testing, but manually, after all optimizations and fine-tunings on previous history.